Translate

Friday, September 5, 2014

What is Justice

Justice can be defined a lot of different ways depending on who is enforcing it. It’s not always good under some circumstances. My personal definition of justice is the enforcement of social, religious, and cultural norms. In Plato's Republic They define justice as "the advantage of the stronger" which I think means that whoever has power decides what justice is and will shape it to their ideals. This could be good or bad depending on the person in power. Someone with good intentions, who is in power, will probably try to improve the society by enforcing what he thinks are good morals, but someone with bad intentions might enforce morals that help their own personal gain.
According to dictionary.com, justice is “the quality of being just; righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness” or “the administering of deserved punishment or reward. “ The second definition is very similar to my definition of justice; except they do not say what decides if something deserves a reward or a punishment. Their definitions of justice also imply that justice is always good when they describe it as “moral rightness”. I personally believe that justice is only as just as its enforcers. For example, before slavery was abolished whenever a slave escaped it was considered justice when they were caught and returned.
One good way to find out what we think justice is, is by looking at how we portray heroes in movies, TV shows, comics, etc. Almost every hero has some sort of ability that everyday people lack, whether it be a super hero who can fly, or a super spy with a razor sharp mine. I think this shows that people believe that only people more powerful than them can enforce justice, and a typical person cannot do it themselves. The problem is, in the real world where there are no heroes, people still have the same assumption that they cannot enforce they look to their leaders to take up the role, and their leaders then get to decide how to enforce it.

1 comment:

  1. Your first sentence makes a great point right off the bat. The people enforcing justice seem to be the ones who get to define it. That's a really interesting way to start, and it makes a lot of sense, especially considering how we look at justice and the role of the Executive Branch in the USA.

    Plato and Socrates later try to discredit the idea of justice being the interest of the stronger. Perhaps that was how it was currently viewed, but it seems to be something more than that.

    You make a really good claim at the end when you talk about the way "Justice" is portrayed in the media. You make very strong points about Just Heros having something normal people don't. It's interesting that they have to be superhuman to be able to determine and then deliver something just. I had never thought about that before and I want to keep thinking about it now.

    Thanks for making me think!

    ReplyDelete